home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=90TT3298>
- <title>
- Dec. 10, 1990: A Case Of Biting Irony
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1990
- Dec. 10, 1990 What War Would Be Like
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- NATION, Page 46
- A Case of Biting Irony
- </hdr>
- <body>
- <p>Accused of nipping a cop's ear, twins claim mistaken identity
- </p>
- <p> Who chomped off the lower part of officer David Storton's
- right ear? Was it Shawn Blick or Jonathan Blick? One flicker
- of doubt and both Blick brothers--who happen to be identical
- twins--could get off.
- </p>
- <p> The fact that the two are physically identical is about the
- only thing the prosecution and the defense can agree on in the
- case, which is expected to go to trial this month. The Santa
- Clara County district attorney's office charges that on the
- night of May 10, 1988, the twins assaulted Storton when he
- identified himself as a police officer, interrupting their
- attempted break-in of a San Jose apartment. Attorneys for the
- Blicks maintain that the twins were innocently throwing pebbles
- at a friend's window to wake him when they were startled by
- the officer, who was moonlighting as a security guard and was
- wearing only a T-shirt and jeans; they jumped him after he drew
- a gun.
- </p>
- <p> Identifying the actual culprit may not be necessary since
- in California those who help someone commit a crime may be
- found as guilty as the actual perpetrator. Still, a jury could
- choose to convict only the gnasher on one of the meatier
- charges facing the pair, or a judge could decide to impose a
- more severe punishment. One of the four counts against each of
- the 21-year-old brothers, aggravated mayhem, carries a
- mandatory life sentence.
- </p>
- <p> Storton swears he knows who nipped him: Jonathan, the one
- who had long hair on the night of the crime. Clearly an open
- and shut case but for a small detail. By the time the twins
- were arrested three days after the incident, both had short
- haircuts. Storton still insists it was Jonathan. But one of the
- defense attorneys, Chris Carroll, predicts that "there will be
- substantial evidence submitted at the trial to show that the
- officer was mistaken about the identity of the biter."
- </p>
-
- </body>
- </article>
- </text>
-
-